COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT PRATAP SIKSHA SAMITI AND ANOTHER vs PRATAP SIKSHA SAMITI AND 30 OTHERS — A227/3492/2026
Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
CNR: UPHC011490002026
Filing Number
A227/
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
A227/3492/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Matters under Article 227 of Constitution of India ( 185100 )
Sub-Category
Writs relating to matter arising out of Code of Civil Procedure ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT PRATAP SIKSHA SAMITI AND ANOTHER
Adv. RAMESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI
-
2.SMT. SHIVANI VISHWAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRATAP SIKSHA SAMITI AND 30 OTHERS
Adv. ,ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI,SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI,C.S.C. 1123
-
2.ARUNESH SHUKLA
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
3.INDRAJEET KUSHWAHA
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
4.ANUBHAV PANDEY
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
5.JITENDRA SHUKLA
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
6.JANARDAN GUPTA
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
7.DHARMRAJ GAUTAM
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
8.DAYA SINGH
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
9.DAMODAR SINGH
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
10.DINESH PANDEY
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
11.SHRAVAN PATEL
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
12.SAMEER TRIPATHI
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
13.GHASHYAM JAISWAL
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
14.DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
15.RAMESH KUMAR VERMA
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
16.ANIL JOSHI
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
17.VARUN KUMAR DEBEY
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
18.GIRIJESH YADAV
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
19.MAHENDRANAND JAISWAL
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
20.SANTOSH PATEL
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
21.ASHUTOSH TIWARI
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
22.SHILESH PANDEY
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
23.AJAY KUMAR PATEL
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
24.DIPAK GUPTA
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
25.BRIJENDRA
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
26.ABHISHEK
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
27.SURENDRA PANDEY
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
28.JITENDRA MAURYA
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
29.MANVENDRA PARATAP SINGH
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
30.SANTOSH SRIVASTAVA
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
-
31.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE SADAR
Adv. C.S.C. SURESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI
Case History
-
22-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-May-2026
—
Vikas Budhwar
-
22-Apr-2026
—
Vikas Budhwar
-
28-Mar-2026
Vikas BudhwarView PDF
Case Summary: A227/3492/2026 The Allahabad High Court adjourned the matter for further consideration. Notices were issued to all respondents, with service affidavits to be filed within one week and counter affidavits due by May 16, 2026. The petition challenges the inclusion of non-members in a Committee of Management following a Lok Adalat settlement, arguing the original suit was improperly instituted through the President rather than the Manager as required by bylaws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A227/3492/2026
Case Summary: A227/3492/2026 The Allahabad High Court adjourned the matter for further consideration. Notices were issued to all respondents, with service affidavits to be filed within one week and counter affidavits due by May 16, 2026. The petition challenges the inclusion of non-members in a Committee of Management following a Lok Adalat settlement, arguing the original suit was improperly instituted through the President rather than the Manager as required by bylaws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts