ARIF vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/1911/2026

Case under Advocates Act Section 126(2),10-126(2). Next hearing: 26th May 2026.

Next hearing 26-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011489042026

Filing Number

CRLR/

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLR/1911/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISION ( 401300 )

Sub-Category

Criminal Revision against in any matter in 126 Cr.P.C. ( 39 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Advocates Act Section 126(2),10-126(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARIF

    Adv. CHANDRA NATH BHATT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SMT. GULFASHA

Case History

  1. 26-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)

  3. 19-May-2026

    Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)

  4. 12-May-2026

    Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)

  5. 01-May-2026

    As Fresh

    Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)View PDF

    Case Summary: CRLR/1911/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the criminal revision to May 5, 2026, allowing both parties three weeks for mediation to resolve their maintenance dispute. The court clarified that the lower court may continue executing its maintenance order and the wife may file modification applications during pendency of this revision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)

  8. 02-Apr-2026

    Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)

  9. 27-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/1911/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLR/1911/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the criminal revision to May 5, 2026, allowing both parties three weeks for mediation to resolve their maintenance dispute. The court clarified that the lower court may continue executing its maintenance order and the wife may file modification applications during pendency of this revision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case