VIKRAM vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/9228/2026

Disposed: -- on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-Mar-2026

CNR: UPHC011487012026

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

BAIL/9228/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Vivek Varma

Coram

Vivek Varma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKRAM

    Adv. SHASHWAT GARG,JITENDRA KUMAR PANDEY,JITENDRA KUMAR PANDEY, ,JITENDRA KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    As Fresh

    Vivek Varma

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Vivek VarmaView PDF

    Summary of BAIL/9228/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad did not grant or deny bail on the merits. Instead, Justice Vivek Varma directed that applicant Vikram file a supplementary affidavit explaining all cases pending against him, as the State's counsel noted he has a criminal history. The matter was adjourned for fresh hearing on April 6, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Vivek VarmaView PDF

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/9228/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of BAIL/9228/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad did not grant or deny bail on the merits. Instead, Justice Vivek Varma directed that applicant Vikram file a supplementary affidavit explaining all cases pending against him, as the State's counsel noted he has a criminal history. The matter was adjourned for fresh hearing on April 6, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case