JUGUL KISHORE PANDEY @ YUGUL KISHORE PANDEY vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — NA529/1150/2026

Case under Civil Defence Act Section 138,216-138. Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011484932026

Filing Number

NA529/

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

NA529/1150/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Coram

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 401600 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Defence Act Section 138,216-138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JUGUL KISHORE PANDEY @ YUGUL KISHORE PANDEY

    Adv. DHIRAJ SINGH,MINA SINGH,MINA SINGH, ,MINA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.VIVEK SINHA

  3. 3.DURGA CHARAN SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad directed the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Deoria to expeditiously decide the pending Complaint Case No.6860 of 2025 (under Section 138 N.I. Act) without granting unnecessary adjournments, while declining to express any opinion on the merits of the applicant's prayer for urgency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA529/1150/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad directed the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Deoria to expeditiously decide the pending Complaint Case No.6860 of 2025 (under Section 138 N.I. Act) without granting unnecessary adjournments, while declining to express any opinion on the merits of the applicant's prayer for urgency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case