SHAILENDRA KUMAR vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — NABAIL/2599/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 471,43-471. Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011483232026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/2599/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

Coram

Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MINOR ( 64 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 471,43-471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAILENDRA KUMAR

    Adv. DAYA SHANKER PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad granted anticipatory bail to Shailendra Kumar in a fraud case involving charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 388, 406, and 506. The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on the applicant's willingness to cooperate, the disputed amount being deposited, and prior interim protection granted. Kumar was released on a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with two sureties, subject to standard conditions prohibiting evidence tampering, witness harassment, and non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/2599/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad granted anticipatory bail to Shailendra Kumar in a fraud case involving charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 388, 406, and 506. The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on the applicant's willingness to cooperate, the disputed amount being deposited, and prior interim protection granted. Kumar was released on a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with two sureties, subject to standard conditions prohibiting evidence tampering, witness harassment, and non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case