SANDEEP KUMAR vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/9260/2026
Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC011482692026
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
BAIL/9260/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Judge
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Coram
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANDEEP KUMAR
Adv. HEMANT KUMAR DUBEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Dr. Gautam ChowdharyView PDF
The Allahabad High Court rejected Sandeep Kumar's bail application in a case involving charges under IPC sections 61(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, and 69 BNS filed at Gauri Bazaar police station, Devariya district. The court found the allegations of serious nature—that the applicant had lured the victim with false marriage promises and engaged in non-consensual physical relations—credible based on the victim's statement under section 183 BNS and medical evidence, rejecting the applicant's claims of false accusations rooted in land disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/9260/2026
The Allahabad High Court rejected Sandeep Kumar's bail application in a case involving charges under IPC sections 61(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, and 69 BNS filed at Gauri Bazaar police station, Devariya district. The court found the allegations of serious nature—that the applicant had lured the victim with false marriage promises and engaged in non-consensual physical relations—credible based on the victim's statement under section 183 BNS and medical evidence, rejecting the applicant's claims of false accusations rooted in land disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts