SUMIT PANDEY AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,SHEETALA PRASAD PANDEY — NA528/10773/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Next hearing 03-Jul-2026

CNR: UPHC011478742026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

NA528/10773/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMIT PANDEY AND ANOTHER

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR MISHRA

  2. 2.BUDDHISAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,SHEETALA PRASAD PANDEY

  2. 2.SUNITA DEVI

    Adv. SHEETALA PRASAD PANDEY

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jul-2026

    Chawan Prakash

  3. 08-May-2026

    Chawan PrakashView PDF

    The case was called for hearing on May 8, 2026, but neither party appeared before the Allahabad High Court. The court adjourned the matter as fresh for hearing on July 3, 2026, before an appropriate bench, with directions that this matter shall not be treated as tied up or part heard to the current bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    Saurabh Srivastava

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF

  6. 23-Apr-2026

    Saurabh Srivastava

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Saurabh SrivastavaView PDF

  8. 08-Apr-2026

    Saurabh Srivastava

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    Saurabh Srivastava

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/10773/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The case was called for hearing on May 8, 2026, but neither party appeared before the Allahabad High Court. The court adjourned the matter as fresh for hearing on July 3, 2026, before an appropriate bench, with directions that this matter shall not be treated as tied up or part heard to the current bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case