BOBY vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — NA529/1167/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504. Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011476352026

Filing Number

NA529/

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

NA529/1167/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Coram

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 401600 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BOBY

    Adv. PANKAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MANIRAM ALIAS MADANLAL

  3. 3.JITENDRA

  4. 4.JAYWANTI

  5. 5.RAJESH ALIAS RAJ KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad disposed of applicant Boby's petition seeking expeditious resolution of a criminal case pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Mathura (Case No. 491 of 2022 under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506). The court directed the Magistrate's court to decide the case expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournments, provided no legal impediment exists, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA529/1167/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad disposed of applicant Boby's petition seeking expeditious resolution of a criminal case pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Mathura (Case No. 491 of 2022 under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506). The court directed the Magistrate's court to decide the case expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournments, provided no legal impediment exists, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case