SHARMA DEVI vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA529/1171/2026

Case under Advocates Act Section 128,10-128. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.

Next hearing 27-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011471272026

Filing Number

NA529/

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

NA529/1171/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 401600 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Advocates Act Section 128,10-128

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHARMA DEVI

    Adv. JITENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAY,SWETA RAI,SWETA RAI, ,SWETA RAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SUBEDAR

Case History

  1. 27-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-May-2026

    —

    Prashant Mishra-I

  3. 20-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

    Case Summary: NA529/1171/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad directed the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ghazipur to expeditiously decide pending execution cases (Criminal Execution Case Nos. 887 of 2019, 196 of 2021, 148 of 2022) within two months on a day-to-day basis without adjournments. Applicant Sharma Devi sought recovery of unpaid interim maintenance of Rs. 1,500/month awarded in 2007, which the respondent had failed to pay despite a prior 2019 court direction. The court warned that failure to comply would require the lower court judge to appear in person to explain non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA529/1171/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NA529/1171/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad directed the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ghazipur to expeditiously decide pending execution cases (Criminal Execution Case Nos. 887 of 2019, 196 of 2021, 148 of 2022) within two months on a day-to-day basis without adjournments. Applicant Sharma Devi sought recovery of unpaid interim maintenance of Rs. 1,500/month awarded in 2007, which the respondent had failed to pay despite a prior 2019 court direction. The court warned that failure to comply would require the lower court judge to appear in person to explain non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case