GULBASIYA AND 10 OTHERS vs UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS — WRIC/10276/2026

Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011468902026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

WRIC/10276/2026

Registration Date

14-Mar-2026

Judge

Atul Sreedharan , Siddharth Nandan

Coram

Atul Sreedharan , Siddharth Nandan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ANY OTHER WRIT PETITION NOT MENTIONED IN THE CODE BOOK ( 390000 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULBASIYA AND 10 OTHERS

    Adv. SATISH KUMAR MISHRA

  2. 2.SAVITA

  3. 3.POOJA

  4. 4.URMILA

  5. 5.SURSATI

  6. 6.KALWANTI

  7. 7.RUKMANI

  8. 8.GULJARI

  9. 9.HIRAMATI

  10. 10.LAXMI DEVI

  11. 11.MANBHAVTI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

    Adv. ,C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.,PRADEEP SINGH 1123

  2. 2.COLLECTOR/CHAIRMAN DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE

    Adv. PRADEEP SINGH A.S.G.I. C.S.C.

  3. 3.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

    Adv. PRADEEP SINGH A.S.G.I. C.S.C.

  4. 4.GRAM SABHA/ FOREST RIGHT COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN GRAM SABHA- BILLI MARKUNDI

    Adv. PRADEEP SINGH A.S.G.I. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Siddharth Nandan,atul SreedharanView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court ruled that scheduled tribe forest dwellers cannot be evicted from disputed land in reserved forest areas without following Rule 8 procedures under the Forest Rights Act, 2006. The court directed the Collector of Sonbhadra to decide the petitioners' pending applications within three months while ensuring full statutory compliance, and imposed a four-month moratorium on any coercive eviction action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/10276/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court ruled that scheduled tribe forest dwellers cannot be evicted from disputed land in reserved forest areas without following Rule 8 procedures under the Forest Rights Act, 2006. The court directed the Collector of Sonbhadra to decide the petitioners' pending applications within three months while ensuring full statutory compliance, and imposed a four-month moratorium on any coercive eviction action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case