HARI vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - SUDHIR BHARTI — WRIC/10152/2026

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011468432026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

WRIC/10152/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Prakash Padia

Coram

Prakash Padia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Writs relating to Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code 2006 and Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules 2016 ( 110400 )

Sub-Category

( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARI

    Adv. MUNNA TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - SUDHIR BHARTI

  2. 2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

  3. 3.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TEHSIL KASIYA

  4. 4.THESILDAR, TEHSIL KASIYA

  5. 5.GAON SABHA, VILLAGE NATHA PATTI, TAPPA BHATHAHI BHADURAW, PARGANA SIDHUWA JOBANA, TEHSIL KASIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Prakash PadiaView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad directed the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar to expeditiously decide a pending revenue case (filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006) within two months, noting that considerable time had already elapsed without a final decision. The court disposed of the petition with directions to decide strictly in accordance with law without unnecessary adjournments unless legally required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/10152/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad directed the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar to expeditiously decide a pending revenue case (filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006) within two months, noting that considerable time had already elapsed without a final decision. The court disposed of the petition with directions to decide strictly in accordance with law without unnecessary adjournments unless legally required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case