JAYENDRA SINGH ALIAS GUDDU SINGH AND 2 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — CRLP/5592/2026

Next hearing: 26th May 2026.

Next hearing 26-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011466162026

Filing Number

CRLP/

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/5592/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

QUASHING OF FIR ( 150300 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal WRITS

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYENDRA SINGH ALIAS GUDDU SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. RUKSANA

  2. 2.DHARMENDRA SINGH

  3. 3.BRIJENDRA SINGH ALIAS LALIT SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  3. 3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION KURARA

  4. 4.BHUPENDRA SINGH

Case History

  1. 26-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    —

    Ajay Kumar-II , Rajiv Gupta

  3. 19-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Tarun Saxena,ajay BhanotView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP 5592/2026 The Allahabad High Court stayed the arrest of petitioners Jayendra Singh and two others in an FIR registered under Sections 352, 351(3) B.N.S. at Police Station Kurara. The petitioners alleged the FIR arose from a family property partition dispute and was actuated by malafides. The court directed respondents to file counter-affidavits within four weeks and adjourned the matter, finding it requires consideration of whether multiple FIRs indicate malicious prosecution. Petitioners were directed to cooperate with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/5592/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP 5592/2026 The Allahabad High Court stayed the arrest of petitioners Jayendra Singh and two others in an FIR registered under Sections 352, 351(3) B.N.S. at Police Station Kurara. The petitioners alleged the FIR arose from a family property partition dispute and was actuated by malafides. The court directed respondents to file counter-affidavits within four weeks and adjourned the matter, finding it requires consideration of whether multiple FIRs indicate malicious prosecution. Petitioners were directed to cooperate with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case