COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT STANDARD EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY MAUAIMA AND 2 OTHERS vs ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, FIRMS SOCIETIES AND CHITS, PRAYAGRAJ AND 2 OTHERS — WRIC/9899/2026

Disposed: -- on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Mar-2026

CNR: UPHC011464502026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

WRIC/9899/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Anish Kumar Gupta

Coram

Anish Kumar Gupta

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT STANDARD EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY MAUAIMA AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. ADARSH SINGH,MAHENDRA KUMAR,MAHENDRA KUMAR, ,Sr. Advocate,MAHENDRA KUMAR

  2. 2.NURAL ISLAM

    Adv. MAHENDRA KUMAR Sr. Advocate

  3. 3.AYAZ AHMAD

    Adv. MAHENDRA KUMAR Sr. Advocate

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, FIRMS SOCIETIES AND CHITS, PRAYAGRAJ AND 2 OTHERS

    Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR UPADHYAY,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.STATE OF U.P. THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (SECONDARY EDUCATION)

    Adv. C.S.C. PRADEEP KUMAR UPADHYAY

  3. 3.ALLEGED COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT STANDARD EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY MAUAIMA, PRAYAGRAJ THROUGH ITS ALLEGED

    Adv. C.S.C. PRADEEP KUMAR UPADHYAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Kshitij Shailendra

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Kshitij ShailendraView PDF

    This is a preliminary hearing order, not a final judgment. The High Court of Allahabad admitted the writ petition and scheduled it for fresh hearing on 24.03.2026, directing proper service of the petition on all respondents and registering respondent No.3's counsel. The court imposed a restriction preventing adjournment at respondent No.3's instance at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/9899/2026

casestatus.in Summary

This is a preliminary hearing order, not a final judgment. The High Court of Allahabad admitted the writ petition and scheduled it for fresh hearing on 24.03.2026, directing proper service of the petition on all respondents and registering respondent No.3's counsel. The court imposed a restriction preventing adjournment at respondent No.3's instance at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case