BHAI LAL vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS — WRIC/10092/2026

Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

Next hearing 29-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011452132026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

WRIC/10092/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Writs relating to Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code 2006 and Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules 2016 ( 110400 )

Sub-Category

( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAI LAL

    Adv. SHYAM MOHAN SINGH,SHASHANK DWIVEDI,SHASHANK DWIVEDI, ,SHASHANK DWIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

    Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.ASSISTANT COLLECTOR / TEHSILDAR

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.REGIONAL LEKHPAL/ LAND MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. 29-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Manish Kumar Nigam

  3. 21-May-2026

    Manish Kumar Nigam

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Manish Kumar NigamView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the case for further consideration. The court stayed the operation of the respondent's order dated 29.12.2025 and directed respondents to file counter-affidavits within four weeks, with rejoinder affidavits due within two weeks thereafter. The matter concerns whether revenue proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 were properly dropped due to a pending civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Manish Kumar Nigam

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Manish Kumar Nigam

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/10092/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the case for further consideration. The court stayed the operation of the respondent's order dated 29.12.2025 and directed respondents to file counter-affidavits within four weeks, with rejoinder affidavits due within two weeks thereafter. The matter concerns whether revenue proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 were properly dropped due to a pending civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case