VIJAY KUMAR YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA — WRIC/10030/2026
Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC011451812026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
WRIC/10030/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Judge
Arun Kumar
Coram
Arun Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
PANCHAYAT RAJ ( 220300 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAY KUMAR YADAV
Adv. SHYAM LAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA
-
2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
-
3.CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
-
4.DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER
-
5.GRAM SABHA PATHKHAULI RAJA, BLOCK KAPTANGANJ
-
6.SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GRAM PRADHAN OF GRAM SABHA PATHKHAULI RAJA, BLOCK KAPTANGANJ
-
7.SHRI UDITANSHU SHUKLA, SECRETARY OF GRAM SABHA PATHKHAULI RAJA, BLOCK KAPTANGANJ
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Arun KumarView PDF
The Allahabad High Court directed the District Magistrate to conclude disciplinary proceedings against the Gram Pradhan of Gram Panchayat Pathkhauli Raja under Section 95(1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, within one month of receiving this order. The petitioner sought completion of the inquiry after a three-member committee submitted its report on 30.10.2025, but no further action was taken by the District Magistrate. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the case's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/10030/2026
The Allahabad High Court directed the District Magistrate to conclude disciplinary proceedings against the Gram Pradhan of Gram Panchayat Pathkhauli Raja under Section 95(1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, within one month of receiving this order. The petitioner sought completion of the inquiry after a three-member committee submitted its report on 30.10.2025, but no further action was taken by the District Magistrate. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the case's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts