MANOJ KUMAR YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/10585/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 452,43-452. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Next hearing 12-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011451622026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

NA528/10585/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. order summoning accused in a complaint case without filing revision ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 452,43-452

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. DURGESH KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SMT. VINOD DEVI

Case History

  1. 12-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-May-2026

    —

    Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

  3. 05-May-2026

    —

    Padam Narain Mishra

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Padam Narain MishraView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad adjourned Manoj Kumar Yadav's petition to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 15162 of 2023 under IPC Sections 452, 323, 427) filed by Smt. Vinod Devi. The court issued notice to the opposite party, fixed a four-week deadline for counter-affidavit filing, and granted interim protection by restraining coercive action against the applicant until the next hearing. The matter requires further consideration on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/10585/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad adjourned Manoj Kumar Yadav's petition to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 15162 of 2023 under IPC Sections 452, 323, 427) filed by Smt. Vinod Devi. The court issued notice to the opposite party, fixed a four-week deadline for counter-affidavit filing, and granted interim protection by restraining coercive action against the applicant until the next hearing. The matter requires further consideration on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case