KRISHNA GOEL (DECEASED) AND ANOTHER vs GAURAV MOHAN GUPTA AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - PANKAJ AGARWAL — SAPL/222/2026

Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Next hearing 06-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011451152026

Filing Number

SAPL/

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

SAPL/222/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SECOND APPEAL ( 300100 )

Sub-Category

MISC. ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Appeal

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNA GOEL (DECEASED) AND ANOTHER

    Adv. NITIN KUMAR AGRAWAL,ABHISHEK SHUKLA,ABHISHEK SHUKLA, ,ABHISHEK SHUKLA

  2. 2.AJAY KUMAR

    Adv. ABHISHEK SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GAURAV MOHAN GUPTA AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - PANKAJ AGARWAL

  2. 2.THE KUBER COTTON GINNING AND PRESS FACTORY LTD.

  3. 3.SMT. SUDHA GUPTA

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Piyush AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: SAPL/222/2026 The Allahabad High Court admitted a Second Appeal by Krishna Goel (deceased) and another against lower court orders that rejected their objection filed under CPC Order 21 Rules 97-99. The court found arguable points of law warranting consideration and admitted five substantial questions of law (A, C, D, F, G). The matter was adjourned with directions to summon lower court records and issue notice to respondents; the stay application will be considered at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    —

    Piyush Agrawal

  4. 06-May-2026

    —

    Piyush Agrawal

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Mar-2026

    Saurabh Shyam ShamsheryView PDF

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SAPL/222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SAPL/222/2026 The Allahabad High Court admitted a Second Appeal by Krishna Goel (deceased) and another against lower court orders that rejected their objection filed under CPC Order 21 Rules 97-99. The court found arguable points of law warranting consideration and admitted five substantial questions of law (A, C, D, F, G). The matter was adjourned with directions to summon lower court records and issue notice to respondents; the stay application will be considered at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case