MUSLIM vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — NABAIL/2576/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 354,43-354. Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011446892026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/2576/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Coram

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MAJOR ( 65 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 354,43-354

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUSLIM

    Adv. ASHUTOSH KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

  3. 3.SMT. JAITUN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Rajiv Lochan ShuklaView PDF

    The High Court dismissed the applicant Muslim's anticipatory bail application as withdrawn after the A.G.A. objected that he had bypassed the Sessions Court without justification. The court allowed the applicant's counsel to withdraw and approach the Sessions Court instead, directing the office to return the FIR copy to the applicant's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/2576/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court dismissed the applicant Muslim's anticipatory bail application as withdrawn after the A.G.A. objected that he had bypassed the Sessions Court without justification. The court allowed the applicant's counsel to withdraw and approach the Sessions Court instead, directing the office to return the FIR copy to the applicant's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case