JAI KUMAR SINGH AND 120 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND 35 OTHERS — WRIA/3729/2026
Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC011441472026
Filing Number
WRIA/
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
WRIA/3729/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Judge
Vikas Budhwar
Coram
Vikas Budhwar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (SINGLE BENCH) ( 11500 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAI KUMAR SINGH AND 120 OTHERS
Adv. MIRZA FAHEEM BEG
-
2.VIJENDRA PAL SINGH
-
3.JAGESHWAR DAYAL
-
4.RAVISH KUMAR BHATELI
-
5.RAM BILAS SINGH YADAV
-
6.CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
-
7.RAM BHARAT SINGH
-
8.ANAND PRAKASH
-
9.SUBHASH CHANDRA
-
10.AJIT KUMAR
-
11.DAU JI DAYAL SHARMA
-
12.DUTVEER SINGH
-
13.RAKESH SINGH YADAV
-
14.NAKCHHED KANAUJIYA
-
15.NAND KISHOR
-
16.RAJ KUMAR
-
17.RAGHUVEER SINGH
-
18.MAHARAJ SINGH
-
19.SURENDRA PRATAP SINGH
-
20.PREM CHANDRA
-
21.NARESH SINGH
-
22.FIROZ AKHTAR
-
23.SHIV SINGH
-
24.BALRAM SINGH
-
25.KALACTAR SINGH
-
26.DALVEER SINGH
-
27.BHEESMPAL SINGH
-
28.TEJVEER SINGH
-
29.BHARATVEER SINGH
-
30.OMVEER SINGH
-
31.MUKESH PAL SINGH
-
32.KAMLESH KUMAR AWASTHI
-
33.SUKHRAM
-
34.SANJAY KUMAR AWASTHI
-
35.YOGENDRA NATH MOHAN TIWARI
-
36.PRAVIN KUMAR TYAGI
-
37.RABENDRA SINGH
-
38.VISHNU KANT SINGH
-
39.NAVEEN JAYANT
-
40.ASHA RAM TYAGI
-
41.ROSHAN LAL
-
42.YASHPAL SINGH
-
43.KAMLESH SHARMA
-
44.ASHOK KUMAR
-
45.ROHTASH KUMAR SHARMA
-
46.ANENDRA SINGH
-
47.PRABHAKAR UPADHYAY
-
48.RAMVILAS
-
49.BALRAM SINGH
-
50.VILAP SINGH
-
51.JAICHANDRA SINGH
-
52.RAJ KUMAR
-
53.MAHANGU YADAV
-
54.POORAN SINGH
-
55.RAM CHARAN YADAV
-
56.HEERA LAL
-
57.VIRENDRA KUMAR
-
58.MOHD. AYYUB SIDDIQUI
-
59.RAM NATH
-
60.YOGENDRA SINGH
-
61.MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA
-
62.RAMVIR SINGH
-
63.NARENDRA KUMAR
-
64.RAKESH KUMAR
-
65.ARVIND SINGH
-
66.OM PRAKASH SINGH MALIK
-
67.AJENDRA SINGH
-
68.MEGHNATH SINGH
-
69.MAHARAJ SINGH
-
70.DAYANAND SINGH
-
71.BRAJNESH KUMAR
-
72.RAJESH KUMAR PANDEY
-
73.PUTTU SINGH
-
74.VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA
-
75.RAKESH KUMAR
-
76.RAJENDRA SINGH
-
77.DIWAKAR KANT PANDEY
-
78.RIYAZUL HAQUE
-
79.PHOOL CHANDRA
-
80.BHUWAL CHANDRA SINGH
-
81.KRISHNA KUMAR SHARMA
-
82.RAM KISHORE SINGH
-
83.VIJAY SHANKAR
-
84.DHARMVEER SINGH
-
85.RAJVAR SINGH YADAV
-
86.SHIV PRAKASH SINGH
-
87.PRAKASH CHAND
-
88.VIJAY PRATAP SINGH
-
89.RAM AUTAR SINGH
-
90.OMKAR SINGH
-
91.RAKESH KUMAR
-
92.SANJEEV KUMAR DUBEY
-
93.RAJESH KUMAR
-
94.BIJENDRA KUMAR
-
95.NARDEV SINGH
-
96.JITENDRA SINGH YADAV
-
97.DHARMENDERA KUMAR BALIYAN
-
98.SURESH CHANDRA
-
99.JITENDRA KUMAR GAUTAM
-
100.AJAY SHANKAR TRIPATHI
-
101.BRAJESH KUMAR SHARMA
-
102.BAL SINGH
-
103.MAHESH CHANDRA
-
104.RAM NATH GAUTAM
-
105.DHARAM SINGH
-
106.UMASHANKAR YADAV
-
107.ANIL KUMAR SINGH
-
108.DHRUV RAM YADAV
-
109.RAM SACHITRA
-
110.SURESH YADAV
-
111.RAMESH MISHRA
-
112.RAMESH CHANDRA DUBEY
-
113.HIMMAT SINGH
-
114.RANBEER SINGH
-
115.KAMLESH BABU
-
116.NOOR MOHAMMAD
-
117.MALKHAN SINGH
-
118.RAVINDRA KUMAR AWASTI
-
119.RAM DAS
-
120.SANTOSH KUMAR TRIPATHI
-
121.UMESH CHANDRA YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 35 OTHERS
Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123
-
2.THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, GENERAL OF POLICE (ESTABLISHMENT), POLICE HEADQUARTER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.THE FINANCE CONTROLLER, POLICE HEADQUARTER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, GENERAL OF POLICE (SPECIAL BRANCH ABHISUCHANA), GOKHELEY MARG
Adv. C.S.C.
-
6.POLICE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSINERATE, PRAYAGRAJ
Adv. C.S.C.
-
7.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MATHURA
Adv. C.S.C.
-
8.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANNAUJ
Adv. C.S.C.
-
9.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALIGARH
Adv. C.S.C.
-
10.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JALAUN
Adv. C.S.C.
-
11.POLICE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSINERATE, KANPUR NAGAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
12.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HATHRAS
Adv. C.S.C.
-
13.POLICE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSINERATE, AGR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
14.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, FIROZABAD
Adv. C.S.C.
-
15.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ETAH
Adv. C.S.C.
-
16.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAREILLY
Adv. C.S.C.
-
17.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUZAFFARNAGAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
18.POLICE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSINERATE, GAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
19.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SHAMLI
Adv. C.S.C.
-
20.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITRAKOOT
Adv. C.S.C.
-
21.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SAHARANPUR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
22.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SAMBHAL
Adv. C.S.C.
-
23.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HAMIRPUR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
24.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KASGANJ
Adv. C.S.C.
-
25.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AZAMGARH
Adv. C.S.C.
-
26.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, LALITPUR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
27.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANPUR DEHAT
Adv. C.S.C.
-
28.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, FATEHPUR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
29.POLICE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSINERATE, GHAZIABAD
Adv. C.S.C.
-
30.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BANDA
Adv. C.S.C.
-
31.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BULANDSHAHAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
32.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BALLIA
Adv. C.S.C.
-
33.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AURAIYA
Adv. C.S.C.
-
34.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MIRZAPUR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
35.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ETAWAH
Adv. C.S.C.
-
36.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JHANSI
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Vikas BudhwarView PDF
The Allahabad High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by 121 police employees (Head Constables, Sub Inspectors, Inspectors) seeking one additional increment after completing 19 years of service per a 2000 Government Order. The court, relying on favorable precedent judgments in similar cases, directed the Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel) to decide the petitioners' claims within three months without adjudicating the substantive merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIA/3729/2026
The Allahabad High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by 121 police employees (Head Constables, Sub Inspectors, Inspectors) seeking one additional increment after completing 19 years of service per a 2000 Government Order. The court, relying on favorable precedent judgments in similar cases, directed the Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel) to decide the petitioners' claims within three months without adjudicating the substantive merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts