SMT. NAGMA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS — CRLP/5586/2026
Disposed: -- on 28th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC011437072026
Filing Number
CRLP/
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLP/5586/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Judge
Padam Narain Mishra , Rajeev Misra
Coram
Padam Narain Mishra , Rajeev Misra
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
QUASHING OF FIR ( 150300 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal WRITS
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. NAGMA AND ANOTHER
Adv. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV,CHANDRA SHEKHAR PAL,CHANDRA SHEKHAR PAL, ,CHANDRA SHEKHAR PAL
-
2.TALIM URF TALIB
Adv. CHANDRA SHEKHAR PAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. ,G.A. 1123
-
2.STATION OFFICER/ INVESTIGATION OFFICER, P.S.- KANKERKHEDA
Adv. G.A.
-
3.SRI. AKRAM
Adv. G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
—
Tarun Saxena , Ajay Bhanot
-
17-Mar-2026
Tarun Saxena,ajay BhanotView PDF
Summary: The Allahabad High Court granted interim relief to petitioners Smt. Nagma and another in their writ petition challenging an FIR registered under Section 137(2) of the BNS at Police Station Kankerkheda. The petitioners, claiming to be adult consensual partners who married voluntarily, argued the FIR was filed maliciously by the respondent's family members to disrupt their marriage. The Court stayed the petitioners' arrest pending the next hearing on 28.04.2026 or police report submission, citing the Supreme Court principle that courts must scrutinize FIRs alleged to be frivolous, vexatious, or motivated by personal vendetta, and direct the State to file a counter-affidavit with victim statements and cooperation details in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/5586/2026
Summary: The Allahabad High Court granted interim relief to petitioners Smt. Nagma and another in their writ petition challenging an FIR registered under Section 137(2) of the BNS at Police Station Kankerkheda. The petitioners, claiming to be adult consensual partners who married voluntarily, argued the FIR was filed maliciously by the respondent's family members to disrupt their marriage. The Court stayed the petitioners' arrest pending the next hearing on 28.04.2026 or police report submission, citing the Supreme Court principle that courts must scrutinize FIRs alleged to be frivolous, vexatious, or motivated by personal vendetta, and direct the State to file a counter-affidavit with victim statements and cooperation details in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts