GAUTAM KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS — WRIC/10062/2026

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011415592026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

WRIC/10062/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi , Kunal Ravi Singh

Coram

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi , Kunal Ravi Singh

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( 340700 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAUTAM KUMAR

    Adv. NISHANT VERMA,SAGAR MEHROTRA,SAGAR MEHROTRA, ,SAGAR MEHROTRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

    Adv. ,TEJASVI MISRA,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

    Adv. C.S.C. TEJASVI MISRA

  3. 3.VICE CHAIRMAN, GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

    Adv. C.S.C. TEJASVI MISRA

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

    Adv. C.S.C. TEJASVI MISRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,kunal Ravi SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Gautam Kumar's writ petition seeking directions against the Ghaziabad Development Authority to take action against illegal construction on the terrace of Krit Apartments. The Court found the dispute was inter se between private parties already pending before a competent Civil Court, which had granted an injunction in the petitioner's favor, making High Court intervention inappropriate. The petition was disposed of, leaving the petitioner to pursue appropriate relief in the Civil Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/10062/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Gautam Kumar's writ petition seeking directions against the Ghaziabad Development Authority to take action against illegal construction on the terrace of Krit Apartments. The Court found the dispute was inter se between private parties already pending before a competent Civil Court, which had granted an injunction in the petitioner's favor, making High Court intervention inappropriate. The petition was disposed of, leaving the petitioner to pursue appropriate relief in the Civil Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case