RAJESH KUMAR @ RAJU vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,CHANDRA SHEKHER SINGH,AJEET KUMAR YADAV — CRLR/1800/2026
Case under Advocates Act Section 145,10-145. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
CNR: UPHC011414142026
Filing Number
CRLR/
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLR/1800/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISION ( 401300 )
Sub-Category
Against order u/s 145 Cr.P.C. ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH KUMAR @ RAJU
Adv. ARVIND PRABODH DUBEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,CHANDRA SHEKHER SINGH,AJEET KUMAR YADAV
-
2.CITY MAGISTRATE
Adv. AJEET KUMAR YADAV CHANDRA SHEKHER SINGH
-
3.MANOJ KUMAR
Adv. AJEET KUMAR YADAV CHANDRA SHEKHER SINGH
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
05-May-2026
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
28-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Abdul ShahidView PDF
Case Summary: CRLR 1800/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad admitted Rajesh Kumar's criminal revision petition challenging the City Magistrate's illegal attachment order and receiver appointment regarding a shop where a civil suit is pending. The court issued notice to opposite parties and the State to file counter-affidavits within three weeks, stayed further proceedings in the underlying criminal case, and adjourned the matter for five weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLR/1800/2026
Case Summary: CRLR 1800/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad admitted Rajesh Kumar's criminal revision petition challenging the City Magistrate's illegal attachment order and receiver appointment regarding a shop where a civil suit is pending. The court issued notice to opposite parties and the State to file counter-affidavits within three weeks, stayed further proceedings in the underlying criminal case, and adjourned the matter for five weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts