SMT BHARTI AND 3 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/10326/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 406,43-406. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011413592026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
NA528/10326/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. order summoning accused in a complaint case without filing revision ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT BHARTI AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. YOGESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,NOOR MUHAMMAD,NOOR MUHAMMAD, ,NOOR MUHAMMAD
-
2.DHARMPAL
Adv. NOOR MUHAMMAD
-
3.SMT. LAXMI DEVI
Adv. NOOR MUHAMMAD
-
4.HARSH KUMAR
Adv. NOOR MUHAMMAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.VIJAY KUMAR
Case History
-
12-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-May-2026
—
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
-
05-May-2026
—
Padam Narain Mishra
-
06-Apr-2026
Padam Narain MishraView PDF
Case Summary: In Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 10326/2026 at the High Court of Allahabad, the application filed by Smt Bharti and 3 Others against the State of U.P. and Another was called for hearing on April 6, 2026. Despite a revised call, no one appeared on behalf of the applicants, though the learned AGA for the State was present. The Court, in the interest of justice, adjourned the matter and listed it for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
—
Padam Narain Mishra
-
30-Mar-2026
—
Padam Narain Mishra
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/10326/2026
Case Summary: In Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 10326/2026 at the High Court of Allahabad, the application filed by Smt Bharti and 3 Others against the State of U.P. and Another was called for hearing on April 6, 2026. Despite a revised call, no one appeared on behalf of the applicants, though the learned AGA for the State was present. The Court, in the interest of justice, adjourned the matter and listed it for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts