IBRAHIM ANSARI vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/8638/2026

Case under Apprentices Act Section 8,48-8. Disposed: -- on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011411392026

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

BAIL/8638/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Sameer Jain

Coram

Sameer Jain

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Apprentices Act Section 8,48-8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IBRAHIM ANSARI

    Adv. RAMAJAN AHMAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Sameer JainView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to Ibrahim Ansari in a NDPS Act case (Crime No. 185/2025) involving alleged poppy recovery. The court found that the contraband was recovered from co-accused Amarpal Singh's store (not applicant's), applicant was not arrested at the scene, had no criminal history, and the co-accused was already granted bail by the same court, making applicant's case stronger. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties and standard conditions including court appearance and no evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    —

    Sameer Jain

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    —

    Ashutosh Srivastava

  5. 03-Apr-2026

    —

    Harvir Singh

  6. 28-Mar-2026

    —

    Krishan Pahal

  7. 20-Mar-2026

    Krishan PahalView PDF

  8. 20-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/8638/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to Ibrahim Ansari in a NDPS Act case (Crime No. 185/2025) involving alleged poppy recovery. The court found that the contraband was recovered from co-accused Amarpal Singh's store (not applicant's), applicant was not arrested at the scene, had no criminal history, and the co-accused was already granted bail by the same court, making applicant's case stronger. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties and standard conditions including court appearance and no evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case