SMT PUJA AND 3 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,MANVENDRA SINGH — CRLP/5867/2026
Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011405482026
Filing Number
CRLP/
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLP/5867/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
QUASHING OF FIR ( 150300 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal WRITS
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT PUJA AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. VINAY KUMAR TRIPATHI,SHAKTI DUBEY,SHAKTI DUBEY, ,SHAKTI DUBEY
-
2.PANKAJ ALIAS PANKAJ KUMAR
Adv. SHAKTI DUBEY
-
3.AJAY
Adv. SHAKTI DUBEY
-
4.SEVA RAM
Adv. SHAKTI DUBEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,MANVENDRA SINGH
-
2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION POWAYAN
Adv. MANVENDRA SINGH
-
3.TEEKA RAM
Adv. MANVENDRA SINGH
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
—
Ajay Kumar-II , Rajiv Gupta
-
20-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2026
Achal Sachdev,rajiv GuptaView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP 5867/2026 The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the case to 20.05.2026 for further consideration. The petitioners sought quashing of an FIR (Case Crime No. 109/2026 u/s 87 B.N.S.) alleging they had consensually married on 17.02.2026, with the 20-year-old petitioner acting of her own free will. The court issued notice to respondent no. 3, directed filing of counter and rejoinder affidavits, and granted interim protection against arrest to all petitioners pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/5867/2026
Case Summary: CRLP 5867/2026 The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the case to 20.05.2026 for further consideration. The petitioners sought quashing of an FIR (Case Crime No. 109/2026 u/s 87 B.N.S.) alleging they had consensually married on 17.02.2026, with the 20-year-old petitioner acting of her own free will. The court issued notice to respondent no. 3, directed filing of counter and rejoinder affidavits, and granted interim protection against arrest to all petitioners pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts