PREM PAL DHANGAR vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS — WRIC/10231/2026
Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC011404592026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
WRIC/10231/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Judge
Arun Kumar
Coram
Arun Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITIONS (EXCEPT ORDERS OF CIVIL COURT AND TAX MATTERS) ( 181000 )
Sub-Category
ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE AUTHORITY ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PREM PAL DHANGAR
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR TIWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123
-
2.DISTRICT LEVEL CASTE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, GHAZIABAD, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/ DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DIVISIONAL LEVEL CASTE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, MEERUT DIVISION MEERUT THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/ COMMISSIONER
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Arun KumarView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad quashed the cancellation orders of Prem Pal Dhangar's caste certificate, holding that the District and Divisional Caste Scrutiny Committees violated Supreme Court mandates by failing to refer the matter to a Vigilance Cell before deciding. The court directed the respondents to comply with the Kumari Madhuri Patil judgment and conduct a proper Vigilance Cell investigation before passing fresh orders on the caste certificate claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/10231/2026
The High Court of Allahabad quashed the cancellation orders of Prem Pal Dhangar's caste certificate, holding that the District and Divisional Caste Scrutiny Committees violated Supreme Court mandates by failing to refer the matter to a Vigilance Cell before deciding. The court directed the respondents to comply with the Kumari Madhuri Patil judgment and conduct a proper Vigilance Cell investigation before passing fresh orders on the caste certificate claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts