SHIVAM CHAUHAN MINOR vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/10474/2026

Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v). Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Next hearing 12-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011403522026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

NA528/10474/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v)
Andhra State Act Section 504,43-504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVAM CHAUHAN MINOR

    Adv. ARVIND SINGH PARMAR,VIRENDRA SINGH PARMAR,VIRENDRA SINGH PARMAR, ,VIRENDRA SINGH PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.JAIMANTI

Case History

  1. 12-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-May-2026

    —

    Samit Gopal

  3. 05-May-2026

    —

    Samit Gopal

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Samit GopalView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the application filed by minor Shivam Chauhan under Section 528 BNSS. The applicant's counsel argued that co-accused Manju Devi and Nitu received a favorable order (dated 10.11.2025) directing no coercive action, and sought similar relief on parity grounds. The State objected to maintainability, contending the order was appealable. The Court issued notice to the second opposite party and scheduled the matter for hearing on 05.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/10474/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the application filed by minor Shivam Chauhan under Section 528 BNSS. The applicant's counsel argued that co-accused Manju Devi and Nitu received a favorable order (dated 10.11.2025) directing no coercive action, and sought similar relief on parity grounds. The State objected to maintainability, contending the order was appealable. The Court issued notice to the second opposite party and scheduled the matter for hearing on 05.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case