SURESH KUMAR vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS — WRIB/1055/2026
Disposed: -- on 13th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC011402882026
Filing Number
WRIB/
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
WRIB/1055/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Judge
Chandra Kumar Rai
Coram
Chandra Kumar Rai
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS ( 100100 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESH KUMAR
Adv. KRISHNA KUMAR CHAURASIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123
-
2.DISTRICT DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION / DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, RAMAIEPATTI
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.PRABHARI ADHIKARI RAJASHWA MAAL ABHILEKHAGAAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.SHIV NATH
Adv. C.S.C.
-
6.MUNNOO
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
As Fresh
Dinesh Pathak
-
16-Mar-2026
Dinesh PathakView PDF
The High Court found that consolidation proceedings under Section 9A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act remained undecided despite a prior court order from 2018. The court granted the Standing Counsel three weeks to obtain instructions from the Consolidation Officer explaining the non-compliance and adjourned the matter for fresh hearing on April 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIB/1055/2026
The High Court found that consolidation proceedings under Section 9A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act remained undecided despite a prior court order from 2018. The court granted the Standing Counsel three weeks to obtain instructions from the Consolidation Officer explaining the non-compliance and adjourned the matter for fresh hearing on April 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts