HAJRAT ALI vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — NA528/10724/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 376,43-376. Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC011399932026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
NA528/10724/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Judge
Avnish Saxena
Coram
Avnish Saxena
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HAJRAT ALI
Adv. MOHD. SHAHANSHAH KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.
-
2.INFORMANT
-
3.THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE
-
4.THE CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Avnish SaxenaView PDF
The Allahabad High Court disposed of Hajrat Ali's application seeking quashing of an FIR for enticement (Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and POCSO Act). The court allowed the parties—who have since married and had children—to file a compromise before the trial court within 30 days. If verified by all parties, the trial court proceedings shall be stayed for 60 days, and upon joint application, the court may quash the criminal proceedings, following precedent recognizing that the parties' marriage and family life warrants non-interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/10724/2026
The Allahabad High Court disposed of Hajrat Ali's application seeking quashing of an FIR for enticement (Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and POCSO Act). The court allowed the parties—who have since married and had children—to file a compromise before the trial court within 30 days. If verified by all parties, the trial court proceedings shall be stayed for 60 days, and upon joint application, the court may quash the criminal proceedings, following precedent recognizing that the parties' marriage and family life warrants non-interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts