RAKESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (ADMINISTRATION)/ARBITRATOR AND 2 OTHERS — ARPL/67/2026
Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011394102026
Filing Number
ARPL/
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
ARPL/67/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL U/S 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 ( 301400 )
Sub-Category
APPEAL U/S 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Appeal
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAKESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. HIMANSHU DUBEY,BIRENDRA KUMAR,BIRENDRA KUMAR, ,Sr. Advocate,BIRENDRA KUMAR
-
2.SUKHVEER SINGH
Adv. BIRENDRA KUMAR Sr. Advocate
-
3.BHUJVEER SINGH
Adv. BIRENDRA KUMAR Sr. Advocate
Respondent(s)
-
1.ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (ADMINISTRATION)/ARBITRATOR AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. ,PRANJAL MEHROTRA 1123
-
2.PROJECT DIRECTOR, PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT
Adv. PRANJAL MEHROTRA
-
3.ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. PRANJAL MEHROTRA
Case History
-
20-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-May-2026
—
Piyush Agrawal
-
16-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Rohit Ranjan AgarwalView PDF
Summary: An appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 filed by Rakesh Kumar and 2 others against the Additional Commissioner (Administration)/Arbitrator and 2 others was heard by the Allahabad High Court on March 18, 2026. The court issued notice to respondents and directed the R.P.A.D. to serve notice within 10 days using additional modes of service beyond normal service. The matter was adjourned and listed for hearing on the date specified in the notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ARPL/67/2026
Summary: An appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 filed by Rakesh Kumar and 2 others against the Additional Commissioner (Administration)/Arbitrator and 2 others was heard by the Allahabad High Court on March 18, 2026. The court issued notice to respondents and directed the R.P.A.D. to serve notice within 10 days using additional modes of service beyond normal service. The matter was adjourned and listed for hearing on the date specified in the notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts