SMT PUSHPAWATI vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS — WRIC/10002/2026

Disposed: -- on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: UPHC011386332026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

WRIC/10002/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Pankaj Bhatia

Coram

Pankaj Bhatia

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

PANCHAYAT RAJ ( 220300 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT PUSHPAWATI

    Adv. PRASHANT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

    Adv. ,C.S.C.,PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA,AMIT KUMAR SINGH 1123

  2. 2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. AMIT KUMAR SINGH PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA C.S.C.

  3. 3.BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

    Adv. AMIT KUMAR SINGH PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA C.S.C.

  4. 4.GRAM PANCHAYAT - PAROKHAR, BLOCK - BAGHAULI

    Adv. AMIT KUMAR SINGH PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA C.S.C.

  5. 5.PANKAJ KUMAR

    Adv. AMIT KUMAR SINGH PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    —

    Siddharth Nandan

  3. 07-May-2026

    —

    Vinod Diwakar

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    —

    Vinod Diwakar

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    —

    Vinod Diwakar

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    —

    Vinod Diwakar

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Vinod DiwakarView PDF

    Smt Pushpawati challenged her removal as Gram Pradhan after the District Magistrate revoked her appointment (dated 23.2.2026) without recording reasons and appointed Pankaj Kumar instead (26.2.2026) under Section 12(J) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1947. The court adjourned the matter to 16.4.2026 for further hearing after granting time to respondents to file instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/10002/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Smt Pushpawati challenged her removal as Gram Pradhan after the District Magistrate revoked her appointment (dated 23.2.2026) without recording reasons and appointed Pankaj Kumar instead (26.2.2026) under Section 12(J) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1947. The court adjourned the matter to 16.4.2026 for further hearing after granting time to respondents to file instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case