MOHD AKHTAR NAMI vs MOHD. ADIL AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - MIHIR GHOSH ROY — A227/3482/2026
Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC011386112026
Filing Number
A227/
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
A227/3482/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Judge
Manish Kumar Nigam
Coram
Manish Kumar Nigam
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Matters under Article 227 of Constitution of India ( 185100 )
Sub-Category
Writs relating to matter arising out of Code of Civil Procedure ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHD AKHTAR NAMI
Adv. PRATEEK KUMAR,KOKIL AGARWAL,KOKIL AGARWAL, ,KOKIL AGARWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHD. ADIL AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - MIHIR GHOSH ROY
-
2.MOHD. NAZIM
-
3.SMT. ABIDA KHATOON
-
4.SMT. RASIDHA KHATOON
-
5.SMT. AYESHA KHATOON
-
6.WALIULLA
-
7.NAEEM AHMAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Manish Kumar NigamView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad disposed of the petition and remanded the case to the trial court to expeditiously decide the pending application under Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C. within six months. The court directed the trial court to decide the application independently according to law without being bound by the revisional court's findings, while ensuring proper service and hearing to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A227/3482/2026
The High Court of Allahabad disposed of the petition and remanded the case to the trial court to expeditiously decide the pending application under Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C. within six months. The court directed the trial court to decide the application independently according to law without being bound by the revisional court's findings, while ensuring proper service and hearing to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts