SANTOSH vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/8602/2026
Disposed: -- on 13th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC011378742026
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
BAIL/8602/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Judge
Ashutosh Srivastava
Coram
Ashutosh Srivastava
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTOSH
Adv. SANDEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
—
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
-
20-Mar-2026
Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalView PDF
The High Court rejected Santosh's bail plea based on parity with co-accused Sangeeta Chaudhary, finding that incomplete facts were presented in Sangeeta's bail hearing, specifically omitting details about execution of sale deeds and Santosh being an imposter of Urvashi. The court granted adjournment and listed the case for fresh hearing on April 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/8602/2026
The High Court rejected Santosh's bail plea based on parity with co-accused Sangeeta Chaudhary, finding that incomplete facts were presented in Sangeeta's bail hearing, specifically omitting details about execution of sale deeds and Santosh being an imposter of Urvashi. The court granted adjournment and listed the case for fresh hearing on April 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts