AKASH vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/8649/2026
Case under Apprentices Act Section 23,48-23. Disposed: -- on 06th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011370732026
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
BAIL/8649/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Judge
Ashutosh Srivastava
Coram
Ashutosh Srivastava
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AKASH
Adv. A.T. PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Ashutosh SrivastavaView PDF
BAIL Application 8649/2026 – DECISION SUMMARY The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad GRANTED bail to applicant Akash, who was arrested on 05.07.2025 in a drug smuggling and copyright infringement case. The court found that Akash was not arrested at the crime scene, nothing was recovered from his possession, and his involvement was based solely on co-accused statements, insufficient to deny bail. The court imposed standard conditions: furnishing personal bond with two sureties, no evidence tampering, no criminal activity, non-intimidation of witnesses, and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
21-Apr-2026
Ashutosh SrivastavaView PDF
-
21-Apr-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
13-Apr-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
09-Apr-2026
As Fresh
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
06-Apr-2026
—
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
23-Mar-2026
Ashutosh SrivastavaView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/8649/2026
BAIL Application 8649/2026 – DECISION SUMMARY The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad GRANTED bail to applicant Akash, who was arrested on 05.07.2025 in a drug smuggling and copyright infringement case. The court found that Akash was not arrested at the crime scene, nothing was recovered from his possession, and his involvement was based solely on co-accused statements, insufficient to deny bail. The court imposed standard conditions: furnishing personal bond with two sureties, no evidence tampering, no criminal activity, non-intimidation of witnesses, and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts