BHUPENDRA KUMAR vs RAMPAL SINGH CHAUHAN — A227/3063/2026

Disposed: -- on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Mar-2026

CNR: UPHC011345002026

Filing Number

A227/

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

A227/3063/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Judge

Dr. Y. K. Srivastava

Coram

Dr. Y. K. Srivastava

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Matters under Article 227 of Constitution of India ( 185100 )

Sub-Category

Writs relating to Rent Control matters including writs arising out of orders passed under section 25 of the Provincial Small ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUPENDRA KUMAR

    Adv. RAM MOHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMPAL SINGH CHAUHAN

    Adv. ,ARPIT AGARWAL 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Dr. Y. K. Srivastava

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Dr. Y. K. Srivastava

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Dr. Y. K. SrivastavaView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court adjourned the Article 227 petition filed by Bhupendra Kumar against Rampal Singh Chauhan to April 6, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel failed to appear despite prior adjournments. The court clarified that the underlying SCC suit shall proceed independently and shall not be delayed by the pendency of this petition, while granting the petitioner a final opportunity to press the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Dr. Y. K. Srivastava

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Dr. Y. K. SrivastavaView PDF

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A227/3063/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court adjourned the Article 227 petition filed by Bhupendra Kumar against Rampal Singh Chauhan to April 6, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel failed to appear despite prior adjournments. The court clarified that the underlying SCC suit shall proceed independently and shall not be delayed by the pendency of this petition, while granting the petitioner a final opportunity to press the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case