CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EPFO THROUGH THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EPFO vs CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT KANPUR AND 2 OTHERS — WRIC/9742/2026
Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: UPHC011334602026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
WRIC/9742/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT 1952 ( 21900 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EPFO THROUGH THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EPFO
Adv. MANAS BHARGAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT KANPUR AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. ,ALOK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA 1123
-
2.CHHATA SUGAR COMPANY LTD.
Adv. ALOK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-
3.M/S JAI HIND SECURITY SERVICES
Adv. ALOK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jul-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
06-Apr-2026
Vinod DiwakarView PDF
Case Summary: WRIC 9742/2026 The High Court of Allahabad admitted EPFO's writ petition challenging an appellate order dated 28.02.2025 that remanded the matter for fresh decision regarding statutory Provident Fund dues (2009-2012) allegedly unpaid by the employer. The court found the matter required consideration and stayed the impugned order's effect. Respondents were directed to file counter-affidavits within four weeks detailing compliance with EPF provisions. Case adjourned to 09.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
30-Mar-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/9742/2026
Case Summary: WRIC 9742/2026 The High Court of Allahabad admitted EPFO's writ petition challenging an appellate order dated 28.02.2025 that remanded the matter for fresh decision regarding statutory Provident Fund dues (2009-2012) allegedly unpaid by the employer. The court found the matter required consideration and stayed the impugned order's effect. Respondents were directed to file counter-affidavits within four weeks detailing compliance with EPF provisions. Case adjourned to 09.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts