HUMAYUUN ABBAS ZAIDI vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS — WRIC/10219/2026

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011332262026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

WRIC/10219/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Sudhanshu Chauhan , Saral Srivastava

Coram

Sudhanshu Chauhan , Saral Srivastava

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC. WRITS (NOT COVERED UNDER ANY OTHER HEAD) ( 380000 )

Sub-Category

WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO WAQF BOARD ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HUMAYUUN ABBAS ZAIDI

    Adv. RAJESH KUMAR KANOJIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

    Adv. ,PUNIT KUMAR GUPTA,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.U.P. SIYA CENTRAL BOARD OF WAQF

    Adv. C.S.C. PUNIT KUMAR GUPTA

  3. 3.ADMINISTRATOR, WAQF MANSABIA RAILWAY ROAD

    Adv. C.S.C. PUNIT KUMAR GUPTA

  4. 4.DISTRICT MINORITY WELFARE OFFICE

    Adv. C.S.C. PUNIT KUMAR GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Sudhanshu Chauhan,saral SrivastavaView PDF

    Case Summary: WRIC /10219/2026 The Allahabad High Court dismissed petitioner Humayuun Abbas Zaidi's writ petition challenging a notice dated 18.02.2026 issued by the U.P. Waqf Board. The court held the petition was not maintainable because a statutory remedy of appeal exists under Section 83(9) of the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 1995, which the petitioner must exhaust first. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/10219/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WRIC /10219/2026 The Allahabad High Court dismissed petitioner Humayuun Abbas Zaidi's writ petition challenging a notice dated 18.02.2026 issued by the U.P. Waqf Board. The court held the petition was not maintainable because a statutory remedy of appeal exists under Section 83(9) of the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 1995, which the petitioner must exhaust first. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case