MAYA DEVI vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,NISHANT KUMAR SINGH,BYAS KUMAR PRASAD — BAIL/8968/2026
Disposed: -- on 17th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC011322172026
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
BAIL/8968/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Judge
Sameer Jain
Coram
Sameer Jain
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAYA DEVI
Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR VERMA,AKANSHA VERMA,AKANSHA VERMA, ,AKANSHA VERMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,NISHANT KUMAR SINGH,BYAS KUMAR PRASAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
For Order
Sameer Jain
-
17-Mar-2026
Sameer JainView PDF
In this bail application, the Allahabad High Court did not grant immediate bail to Maya Devi, who has been in jail since January 2, 2026, as the applicant's mother-in-law of the deceased. Instead, the court directed the State and informant to file detailed counter affidavits within two weeks and specifically ordered the State to obtain and file the viscera report, noting its absence from the record as significant. The case was adjourned to April 17, 2026, for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/8968/2026
In this bail application, the Allahabad High Court did not grant immediate bail to Maya Devi, who has been in jail since January 2, 2026, as the applicant's mother-in-law of the deceased. Instead, the court directed the State and informant to file detailed counter affidavits within two weeks and specifically ordered the State to obtain and file the viscera report, noting its absence from the record as significant. The case was adjourned to April 17, 2026, for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts