DURGA PRASAD AND 3 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS — WRIC/10262/2026
Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011321612026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
WRIC/10262/2026
Registration Date
14-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Writs relating to Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code 2006 and Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules 2016 ( 110400 )
Sub-Category
( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DURGA PRASAD AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. MITHILESH KUMAR TIWARI
-
2.HARI PRASAD
-
3.SATI PRASAD
-
4.BABU LAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. ,PRADEEP KUMAR TRIPATHI,C.S.C.,YASH PADIA 1123
-
2.ADDL. COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL) -IST
Adv. YASH PADIA C.S.C. PRADEEP KUMAR TRIPATHI
-
3.ASSISTANT COLLECTOR (IST CLASS) / UP ZILADHIKARI KANPUR SADAR
Adv. YASH PADIA C.S.C. PRADEEP KUMAR TRIPATHI
-
4.KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, DISTRICT KANPUR NAGAR THROUGH ITS VICE - PRESIDENT
Adv. YASH PADIA C.S.C. PRADEEP KUMAR TRIPATHI
Case History
-
07-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
—
Manish Kumar Nigam
-
30-Apr-2026
—
Manish Kumar Nigam
-
08-Apr-2026
Manish Kumar NigamView PDF
Case Summary: In WRIC 10262/2026, the High Court of Allahabad (Justice Manish Kumar Nigam) permitted the petitioner to implead Avas Vikas Parishad as an additional party respondent. The court ordered respondents to file counter-affidavits within three weeks and adjourned the matter to April 30, 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
01-Apr-2026
—
Manish Kumar Nigam
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/10262/2026
Case Summary: In WRIC 10262/2026, the High Court of Allahabad (Justice Manish Kumar Nigam) permitted the petitioner to implead Avas Vikas Parishad as an additional party respondent. The court ordered respondents to file counter-affidavits within three weeks and adjourned the matter to April 30, 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts