VIJAY SHANKAR YADAV vs BOARD OF REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C., ,KRISHNA KANT SINGH — WRIB/1104/2026

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011318782026

Filing Number

WRIB/

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

WRIB/1104/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Chandra Kumar Rai

Coram

Chandra Kumar Rai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

THE U.P.Z.A. & L.R. ACT 1950 ( 110100 )

Sub-Category

Order of Board of Revenue ( 61 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY SHANKAR YADAV

    Adv. DHIRAJ SINGH,SAURABH PANDEY,SAURABH PANDEY, ,SAURABH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BOARD OF REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C., ,KRISHNA KANT SINGH

  2. 2.ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (ADMINITRATION)

    Adv. KRISHNA KANT SINGH

  3. 3.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TEHSIL

    Adv. KRISHNA KANT SINGH

  4. 4.JANARDAN

    Adv. KRISHNA KANT SINGH

  5. 5.AVINASH @ LOHA

    Adv. KRISHNA KANT SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Chandra Kumar RaiView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad disposed of Vijay Shankar Yadav's writ petition seeking to quash a Board of Revenue order and obtain interim protection. The court directed the Board of Revenue to pass appropriate orders on admission of the pending second appeal by March 25, 2026, and thereafter consider the petitioner's interim relief prayer in accordance with law, without expressing opinion on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIB/1104/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad disposed of Vijay Shankar Yadav's writ petition seeking to quash a Board of Revenue order and obtain interim protection. The court directed the Board of Revenue to pass appropriate orders on admission of the pending second appeal by March 25, 2026, and thereafter consider the petitioner's interim relief prayer in accordance with law, without expressing opinion on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case