SHAMIM AND 5 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — CRLP/5099/2026
Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC011318262026
Filing Number
CRLP/
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRLP/5099/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
QUASHING OF FIR ( 150300 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal WRITS
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAMIM AND 5 OTHERS
Adv. LAL BAHADUR
-
2.ZAMIL
-
3.TASLIM
-
4.RUKHSHNA
-
5.SALIM
-
6.NASREEN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
-
3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTWALI SHAHAR
-
4.SMT. UJMA
Case History
-
26-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-May-2026
—
Tarun Saxena , J.J. Munir
-
19-May-2026
—
Achal Sachdev , Rajiv Gupta
-
18-Mar-2026
Achal Sachdev,rajiv GuptaView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP 5099/2026 The Allahabad High Court referred this matrimonial dispute case to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre for settlement. The petitioners must deposit Rs. 20,000 within four weeks; Rs. 15,000 will be paid to respondent no. 4 for expenses. The mediator has two months to propose a solution, with the case relisted on 19.05.2026. Interim protection from arrest granted to petitioners under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 B.N.S. and Dowry Prohibition Act, contingent on deposit and mediation participation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/5099/2026
Case Summary: CRLP 5099/2026 The Allahabad High Court referred this matrimonial dispute case to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre for settlement. The petitioners must deposit Rs. 20,000 within four weeks; Rs. 15,000 will be paid to respondent no. 4 for expenses. The mediator has two months to propose a solution, with the case relisted on 19.05.2026. Interim protection from arrest granted to petitioners under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 B.N.S. and Dowry Prohibition Act, contingent on deposit and mediation participation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts