MANJEET NISHAD @ MANJEET vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/8360/2026

Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011311372026

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

BAIL/8360/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Judge

Ashutosh Srivastava

Coram

Ashutosh Srivastava

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJEET NISHAD @ MANJEET

    Adv. CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH,KRISHNA KANT YADAV,KRISHNA KANT YADAV, ,KRISHNA KANT YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Ashutosh SrivastavaView PDF

    Summary: The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Manjeet Nishad, accused under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, finding it a fit case after considering that he has minimal criminal history, poses no flight risk, and trial conclusion is unlikely soon due to court congestion. The court imposed five conditions including maintaining court presence, not tampering with witnesses, refraining from seeking adjournments during evidence, and furnishing personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    —

    Ashutosh Srivastava

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/8360/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Manjeet Nishad, accused under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, finding it a fit case after considering that he has minimal criminal history, poses no flight risk, and trial conclusion is unlikely soon due to court congestion. The court imposed five conditions including maintaining court presence, not tampering with witnesses, refraining from seeking adjournments during evidence, and furnishing personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case