AARIF vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/8224/2026

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011311022026

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

BAIL/8224/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Judge

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

Coram

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AARIF

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court granted bail to applicant Aarif in a case involving charges under sections 109, 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 324(4), and 333 of BNS. The court found that Aarif was not originally named in the FIR, no specific role was assigned to him in causing injury, and the charge sheet had already been filed, negating any custodial interrogation requirement. The court released him on personal bond with two sureties, imposing conditions against witness intimidation, evidence tampering, and further criminal activity, with breach grounds for bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    —

    Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/8224/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court granted bail to applicant Aarif in a case involving charges under sections 109, 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 324(4), and 333 of BNS. The court found that Aarif was not originally named in the FIR, no specific role was assigned to him in causing injury, and the charge sheet had already been filed, negating any custodial interrogation requirement. The court released him on personal bond with two sureties, imposing conditions against witness intimidation, evidence tampering, and further criminal activity, with breach grounds for bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case