SANT RAJ YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS — WRIC/9555/2026

Next hearing: 15th May 2026.

Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011307142026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

WRIC/9555/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

PANCHAYAT RAJ ( 220300 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANT RAJ YADAV

    Adv. LAL CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA,NEERAJ SRIVASTAVA,NEERAJ SRIVASTAVA, ,NEERAJ SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

    Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK-RAMNAGAR

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. 15-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    —

    Pankaj Bhatia

  3. 08-May-2026

    —

    Arun Kumar

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Arun KumarView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: WRIC No. 9555/2026 The Allahabad High Court partially granted relief to Sant Raj Yadav, a Gram Pradhan, by staying the District Magistrate's order that had ceased his financial and administrative powers pending formal enquiry. The court found the cessation unjustified, noting the District Magistrate failed to record prima facie satisfaction regarding three charges (playground beautification, hand-pump re-bore, RRC Centre construction on private land) and did not adequately consider the petitioner's written replies. The final enquiry must be concluded within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/9555/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: WRIC No. 9555/2026 The Allahabad High Court partially granted relief to Sant Raj Yadav, a Gram Pradhan, by staying the District Magistrate's order that had ceased his financial and administrative powers pending formal enquiry. The court found the cessation unjustified, noting the District Magistrate failed to record prima facie satisfaction regarding three charges (playground beautification, hand-pump re-bore, RRC Centre construction on private land) and did not adequately consider the petitioner's written replies. The final enquiry must be concluded within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case