AMAR SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,AJAY KUMAR MISHRA — CRLA/2500/2026
Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC011305032026
Filing Number
CRLA/
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRLA/2500/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Judge
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
Coram
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Appeal u/s 14A(1) against any order (Including orders of cancellation of bail), not being an interlocutory order, passed by Exclusive Special Court or Special Court of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Amendment Act, 20 ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMAR SINGH
Adv. AJIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,AJAY KUMAR MISHRA
-
2.SEV KARAN
Adv. AJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Amar Singh's criminal appeal challenging the trial court's dismissal of his complaint under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Singh alleged that Dev Karan assaulted him with caste-based abuses over a land dispute; however, the court found the allegations stemmed from an underlying property dispute rather than caste-based atrocity, noting both parties had prior proceedings under breach of peace provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/2500/2026
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Amar Singh's criminal appeal challenging the trial court's dismissal of his complaint under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Singh alleged that Dev Karan assaulted him with caste-based abuses over a land dispute; however, the court found the allegations stemmed from an underlying property dispute rather than caste-based atrocity, noting both parties had prior proceedings under breach of peace provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts