GOPAL JI MISHRA vs STATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C., ,VIJAY BAHADUR MAURYA — WPIL/598/2026

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Mar-2026

CNR: UPHC011302042026

Filing Number

WPIL/

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPIL/598/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Judge

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi , Kunal Ravi Singh

Coram

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi , Kunal Ravi Singh

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ( 370000 )

Sub-Category

MISCELLANEOUS ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL JI MISHRA

    Adv. DINESH KUMAR MISRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C., ,VIJAY BAHADUR MAURYA

  2. 2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. VIJAY BAHADUR MAURYA

  3. 3.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

    Adv. VIJAY BAHADUR MAURYA

  4. 4.NAGAR NIGAM

    Adv. VIJAY BAHADUR MAURYA

  5. 5.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION

    Adv. VIJAY BAHADUR MAURYA

  6. 6.GANESH PRASAD DWIVEDI

    Adv. VIJAY BAHADUR MAURYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,kunal Ravi SinghView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court dismissed the PIL wherein petitioner Gopal Ji Mishra sought a mandamus to prevent closure of a public well and removal of a Shiv Temple at Malak Chaturi, Prayagraj. The court declined to exercise discretionary power under Article 226 of the Constitution, finding no evidence on record that the well and temple were situated on public utility land; the State confirmed they were on private abadi land with no right or claim by respondent No. 6. The court left open common law remedies for the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    —

    Arun Bhansali , Kshitij Shailendra

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPIL/598/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court dismissed the PIL wherein petitioner Gopal Ji Mishra sought a mandamus to prevent closure of a public well and removal of a Shiv Temple at Malak Chaturi, Prayagraj. The court declined to exercise discretionary power under Article 226 of the Constitution, finding no evidence on record that the well and temple were situated on public utility land; the State confirmed they were on private abadi land with no right or claim by respondent No. 6. The court left open common law remedies for the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case