AKASH TYAGI vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,GAURAV SRIVASTAV,MUKESH RAY — BAIL/8884/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 304-B,43-304-B. Disposed: -- on 21st April 2026.
CNR: UPHC011291252026
Filing Number
BAIL/
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
BAIL/8884/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Judge
Sameer Jain
Coram
Sameer Jain
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AKASH TYAGI
Adv. RAGHUBIR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A., ,GAURAV SRIVASTAV,MUKESH RAY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
—
Sameer Jain
-
10-Apr-2026
Sameer JainView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the bail application of Akash Tyagi after his counsel reported a drafting error in the prayer clause. The court granted one week's time to rectify the mistake, with all parties consenting to the adjournment. The case was rescheduled for fresh hearing on April 21, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
As Fresh
Vivek Varma
-
28-Mar-2026
Vivek VarmaView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Sameer JainView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/8884/2026
The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the bail application of Akash Tyagi after his counsel reported a drafting error in the prayer clause. The court granted one week's time to rectify the mistake, with all parties consenting to the adjournment. The case was rescheduled for fresh hearing on April 21, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts