KARAN vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NABAIL/2579/2026

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011283982026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/2579/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Coram

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MAJOR ( 65 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARAN

    Adv. AMAR SINGH YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SHALINI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Rajiv Lochan ShuklaView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court granted anticipatory bail to Karan in a case involving alleged false promise of marriage under Sections 69 and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023. The court found that investigation statements contradicted the FIR's claim of false promise, revealing the victim's genuine intent to marry the applicant, and concluded a six-year consensual relationship does not constitute an offense under Section 69 BNS. Bail was granted with standard conditions including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/2579/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court granted anticipatory bail to Karan in a case involving alleged false promise of marriage under Sections 69 and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023. The court found that investigation statements contradicted the FIR's claim of false promise, revealing the victim's genuine intent to marry the applicant, and concluded a six-year consensual relationship does not constitute an offense under Section 69 BNS. Bail was granted with standard conditions including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and restriction on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case