VISHAL vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/2451/2025

Case under Andhra State Act Section 376,43-376. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.

Next hearing 18-May-2026

CNR: UPHC011263632025

Filing Number

CRLA/

Filing Date

17-Mar-2025

Registration No

CRLA/2451/2025

Registration Date

19-Mar-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter where offence U/s 376 I.P.C. with or without POSCO act is involved (SB) ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 376,43-376

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL

    Adv. TEJ OM PRAKASH GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE, DISTRICT

  3. 3.HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE

  4. 4.INFORMANT

Case History

  1. 18-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    —

    Santosh Rai

  3. 19-May-2026

    —

    Santosh Rai

  4. 18-May-2026

    —

    Jai Prakash Tiwari

  5. 05-May-2026

    —

    Santosh Rai

  6. 01-May-2026

    —

    Santosh Rai

  7. 24-Apr-2026

    —

    Santosh Rai

  8. 17-Apr-2026

    —

    Santosh Rai

  9. 09-Apr-2026

    —

    Santosh Rai

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Jai Prakash TiwariView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLA 2451/2025 Bail was granted to appellant Vishal, convicted under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Act Sections 3/4 for a 10-year sentence. The High Court found that Vishal was not named in the original FIR, the medical report contradicted the prosecution case, he had already served over two years, and possessed no prior criminal history. He must furnish a personal bond with two sureties and deposit the fine within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 13-Feb-2026

    —

    Jai Prakash Tiwari

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  13. 09-Dec-2025

    Subhash Chandra SharmaView PDF

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  15. 02-Dec-2025

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  16. 25-Nov-2025

    —

    Subhash Chandra Sharma

  17. 18-Nov-2025

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  18. 03-Nov-2025

    Rajiv Lochan ShuklaView PDF

  19. 03-Nov-2025

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  20. 07-Oct-2025

    Rajiv Lochan ShuklaView PDF

  21. 07-Oct-2025

    —

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  22. 23-Sep-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  23. 16-Sep-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  24. 08-Sep-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  25. 01-Sep-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  26. 25-Aug-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  27. 19-Aug-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  28. 11-Aug-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  29. 04-Aug-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  30. 28-Jul-2025

    —

    Anish Kumar Gupta

  31. 21-Jul-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  32. 14-Jul-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  33. 03-Jul-2025

    —

    Siddharth

  34. 26-Jun-2025

    —

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  35. 19-Jun-2025

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  36. 12-Jun-2025

    —

    Nalin Kumar Srivastava

  37. 05-Jun-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  38. 29-May-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  39. 22-May-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  40. 16-May-2025

    —

    Rajeev Misra

  41. 02-May-2025

    —

    Kshitij Shailendra

  42. 25-Apr-2025

    —

    Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

  43. 18-Apr-2025

    As Fresh

    Rajeev Misra

  44. 04-Apr-2025

    Rajeev MisraView PDF

  45. 04-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 24-Mar-2025

    Rajeev MisraView PDF

  47. 17-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/2451/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLA 2451/2025 Bail was granted to appellant Vishal, convicted under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Act Sections 3/4 for a 10-year sentence. The High Court found that Vishal was not named in the original FIR, the medical report contradicted the prosecution case, he had already served over two years, and possessed no prior criminal history. He must furnish a personal bond with two sureties and deposit the fine within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case