ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ASHISH KUMAR GUPTA — NABAIL/2512/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 471,43-471. Disposed: -- on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC011260642026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/2512/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

Coram

Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MINOR ( 64 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 471,43-471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,RAJENDRA NARAIN,RAJENDRA NARAIN, ,RAJENDRA NARAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ASHISH KUMAR GUPTA

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. ASHISH KUMAR GUPTA

  3. 3.JITENDRA KUMAR MAURA

    Adv. ASHISH KUMAR GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    —

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    The Allahabad High Court heard an anticipatory bail application (BNSS Section 482) filed by Ashok Kumar Gupta against the State of U.P. and others on March 17, 2026. The court adjourned the matter as fresh to March 19, 2026, as the first informant's counsel and the Additional Government Advocate requested time to prepare arguments and receive instructions respectively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/2512/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court heard an anticipatory bail application (BNSS Section 482) filed by Ashok Kumar Gupta against the State of U.P. and others on March 17, 2026. The court adjourned the matter as fresh to March 19, 2026, as the first informant's counsel and the Additional Government Advocate requested time to prepare arguments and receive instructions respectively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case